Download A bijection between Littlewood-Richardson tableaux and by Kirillov A.N., Schilling A., Shimozono M. PDF

By Kirillov A.N., Schilling A., Shimozono M.

Show description

Read Online or Download A bijection between Littlewood-Richardson tableaux and rigged configurations PDF

Similar system administration books

Network Administration with FreeBSD

The publication is a consultant to community admins who're attracted to extracting complete strength of FreeBSD. Security-one of eternal matters within the IT industry-can be tackled very successfully in FreeBSD. How do you do it? learn the e-book and discover. you could then movement directly to examine intricacies of FreeBSD. simply tweak a number of parameters to make the community fit your atmosphere.

Q&A Constitutional and Administrative Law, 4th Edition (Q&A Series)

This booklet covers the most themes of Constitutional and Administrative legislation classes and is meant to provide scholars a transparent thought of what the examiners are trying to find. This version has been comprehensively revised to take account of the novel programme of constitutional reform brought via the Labour executive when you consider that 1997.

Additional info for A bijection between Littlewood-Richardson tableaux and rigged configurations

Example text

First suppose that (k) Then ≥ (k) (1) = 1. for all 0 ≤ k < c. 16) with k = c − 1. (k) Conversely, if (1) > 1, then < (k) for all 0 ≤ k < c so that c ≤ c− . This (1) proves asc(S) = α1 . (1) Now it is shown that cc(ν, J) − cc(δ(ν, J)) = α1 when R consists of single cells. 1) )). k≥1 Next let us determine the difference of the sums of quantum numbers. 16). The selected strings have label zero before and after being shortened. Then (k) |Jn(k) | − k,n≥1 |Jn | k,n≥1 (mn (ν (k) ) − δn, = (k) )(χ( (k−1) ≤n< (k) ) − χ( (k) ≤n< (k+1) k,n≥1 (α = k≥1 (k) (k−1) −α (k) (k) )− (α k≥1 (k) (k) −α (k) (k+1) χ( )+ k≥1 (k) < (k+1) ).

The case (k−1) − 1 = occur for Case 1 at k − 1. By induction this implies that m For (k) (k−1) (k) −1 = = − 1 and one needs m (k) P −1 (ν) (k) (k−1) (k) = −1. Since (k−1) (k) −1 (ν) (k) −1 (ν) + (k−1) =P So = (k−1) ≥ ≥ . 5), so (k) Suppose P −1 (ν) (k−1) (k−1) = . Hence (k−1) (k−1) = 0. For then −1 (ν (k) (k−1) (k−1) χ( (k−1) = ≤ (k) , and (k−1) ≥ 1. 5), ) ≥ 1. < , and by = − 1. 5) (k−1) (k−1) − 1, so = (k−1) and (k−1) = (k−1) = . By (k−1) . ≤ − 1. This leads to a contradiction ≤ − 1. (k−1) ≥ and (k−1) , by induction the generic case holds for ν (k−1) and (k) (k) ≤ − 1).

7. 6) ❄ ✲ CLR(λ; Rev ). 6. Using the well-known fact Sketch of Proof. βR = γR std ◦Ev = ev ◦ std it is enough to show that the following diagram commutes: RLR(λ; R) ev ✲ γR ❄ CLR(λ; R) RLR(λ; Rev ) γRev ev ❄ ✲ CLR(λ; Rev ). Vol. 8 (2002) Bijection between LR tableaux and rigged configurations 111 By [18] S ev = P (#word(S)) for S ∈ ST(λ) where #w is the reverse of the complement of the word w in the alphabet [1, |λ|]. Let WR(R) (resp. WC(R)) be the set of standard words w such that the standard tableau P (w) is in RLR(λ; R) (resp.

Download PDF sample

A bijection between Littlewood-Richardson tableaux and rigged configurations by Kirillov A.N., Schilling A., Shimozono M.


by Jason
4.3

Rated 4.57 of 5 – based on 11 votes